One loud critic

I read recently that Wanderlei Silva "silenced the critics" with his 2nd round TKO over Cung Le.

To really evaluate that statement, one has to understand exactly what most of the critics were saying about Wanderlei and whether or not his win over Le countered those statements. Personally, I don't think he even came close.

The first thing the critics were saying is that Wanderlei Silva is more than a few fights past his prime. Its often said that the trajectory of a career can change in a single fight. The fight that marked the downward slope of Silva's career was his Pride Heavyweight Grand Prix showdown with Mirko "Cro-Cop" Filipovic.

For the ones that have only seen him in the UFC, Cro-Cop was the baddest of the bad in Pride. Everyone talks about his left high-kick, but he had the whole package when he fought in Japan. He had fast hands, good combinations, as well as great footwork that he used to SET UP his devastating finish. By the time he hit the UFC he relied too much on his one-shot weapon and opponents took advantage of his limited arsenal. When Silva collided with Cro-Cop he was at the top of his game and was coming up from 205 to challenge the best in the division.

Cro-Cop didn't just beat him, he DEMOLISHED him. Cro-Cop gave him the kind of beating that ends careers. He dominated him on the feet, landed some nice ground and pound, then turned out his lights with his signature head kick. Silva's face looked like hamburger at the end of the fight.

He was never the same: since that vicious loss he has gone 3-5, equaling the number of losses he had in his entire CAREER before the Cro-Cop fight. In Pride he was a devastating, brutalizing machine that destroyed the best in the division. Rampage, Ricardo Arona, a PRIME Sakuraba (3 times), Guy Metzger, and Dan Henderson all fell before his whirlwind attack. He didn't just win, he took guys apart.

The fighter that defeated Cung Le was a shadow of the Pride powerhouse. What he showed is that he still has tremendous finishing instincts. He took a bad beating during that fight before finding his way inside and finishing Le. He seemed hesitant and unsure of his timing. The bombs-away style Silva has always employed requires speed and confidence, two things Silva lacked in the Le fight. If you saw Silva in his prime, there is no doubt in your mind that his best days are behind him.

The second things the critics have said, those who really care about Silva as a fighter and as a human being, is that his health is in serious jeopardy. Of his 11 losses 6 have been by KO/TKO, 4 of those have been in the Cro-Cop fight and beyond. Silva never had a great chin, he was rocked in victories over Rampage, Sakuraba, Shungo Oyama, Dan Henderson, and Guy Metzger, and only Rampage and Henderson are known as power punchers. In his KO losses he has been absolutely devastated. All of his KO losses (other than his first, which was via cut) left him stretched out on the mat. Silva is the kind of fighter that goes out on his shield, and its been happening more and more frequently.

One horrific KO can cause permanent damage, 5 can leave you a stuttering wreck. No one who loves the sport and recognizes what Wanderlei has done for it wants to see him end up that way. The win over Le won't repair his damaged neurons, or make his chin any stronger.

Winning that fight was probably the worst thing that could have happened to him. He is now scheduled to fight Vitor Belfort after they finish coaching their respective teams on The Ultimate Fighter. I wrote about the Belfort-Silva rematch in my "Top Fights of All Time That Never Happened" blog. What I wrote about was that considering the wars Silva has been through and the inconsistency of Belforts performances, this rematch was unlikely. The only thing that has changed has been the consistency of Belfort. He has looked faster and stronger at 185, going 4-1 and dispatching ALL of his victims by KO.

The problem is that Silva still has name recognition and can put asses in seats. The Belfort/Silva rematch has a certain historical appeal to the older fans who remember their 1st encounter, but this fight should have happened 10 years ago, and those 10 years have been significantly harder on Silva.

Cung Le is not a top-10 middleweight. Chris Leben, who flattened Silva in his previous fight, is not a top-10 middleweight. Vitor Belfort IS a top-10 middleweight with serious KO power. This fight only makes sense to those blinded by a light that has long-since faded. Silva has serious heart and I know he'll put everything into his fight with Belfort. I can only hope that, win or lose, he chooses to make this fight his last and the critics can be unanimous in their praise of one of the greatest MMA fighters of all time...

Requiem for a lightwight

"This one a long time have I watched. All his life has he looked away...to the future, to the horizon. Never his mind on where he was."

-Yoda

I have actually opened up an MMA blog with a Yoda quote, I think I deserve some credit for that.

It's my opinion that there is NO WAY BJ Penn stays retired for a significant amount of time, but for the purposes of this blog let's assume his career is finished and can be looked back upon in it's entirety. If that is the case I firmly believe that his end as a mixed martial artist can be traced back to a single date: January 31st, 2004.That was the day he choked out the previously unstoppable Matt Hughes and won the welterweight crown. Thus began his love-affair with the welterweight division, a division in which he would never be physically competitive.

Its difficult to imagine in the modern era of MMA how a fighter, even with BJ Penn's extraordinary Jiu-Jitsu credentials (he was the first non-Brazilian to win a black belt world title), could make their MMA debut in the UFC, but thats exactly what he did against Joey Gilbert on May 4th, 2001. After finishing Gilbert in the 1st round, his level of competition picked up considerably. He would finish both Din Thomas and Caol Uno in devastating fashion before getting a much-hyped title fight against lightweight kingpin Jens Pulver. Penn didn't fight with his usual "bombs away" style and lost a 5 round majority decision. It was the kind of loss that inexperienced fighters need early on, and from there big things were still expected of the young prodigy.

After his first loss, he tore though Paul Creighton before entering a mini-tournament for Pulver's vacated belt. He beat Matt Serra and got a controversial draw with Caol Uno in their rematch for the belt. Unfortunately the UFC basically began ignoring the lightweight division and left the title vacant from 2001-2006. BJ left the UFC to DOMINATE Takanori Gomi at Rumble on the Rock, then returned for his fateful fight against Matt Hughes at 170.

I understand why he did it at the time. The UFC had no title for him to fight for, and Matt Hughes was on an historic run in the division. He had little to lose and a lot to gain, and BOY did he deliver. He took the champ to the mat early and ROCKED him with a vicious right hand before finishing him off with his signature rear-naked. That was the beginning of a BIZARRE trend in BJ Penn's spectacular-yet-inconsistent career.

BJ has a total of 8 losses, only 3 of those are in the lightweight division, and 2 are to the same fighter (Frankie Edgar). BJ had a total of 7 fights in the UFC's welterweight division and went 2-4-1 with BOTH of his wins coming against Matt Hughes.

BJ's unreal talent seemed to come with an almost pathological obsession with testing his competitive limits. The other loss of his career came at the hands of LIGHT-HEAVYWEIGHT Lyoto Machida. BJ's ambition had almost a freak-show quality to it, it was as if he wanted to prove that his phenomenal talent could overcome every physical limitation but, as his record shows, it couldn't.

One must also remember that he insisted on taking on the cream of the welterweight crop. He had no softballs, no tune-ups, and asked for no mercy. He took on Matt Hughes, GSP, Jon Fitch, and Nick Diaz. Thats a murderer's row of talent and he took it on despite his well-known distain for the rigors of training (in fact, I would say he gave away one fight apiece to GSP and Matt Hughes due to his shallow gas tank).

Changing weight classes has always been the way to attract big paydays in combat sports. Most of the great fights in boxing history outside of the heavyweight division happened because one of the combatants was willing to get out of their comfort zone. The reason that is so difficult in MMA is 2-fold:

#1. There are fewer weight classes and therefore more of a weight difference between them.

#2. The grappling inherent in MMA makes the size difference MUCH more of an issue

Between the limits of 154-175 there are 4 distinct weight-classes in boxing. Between roughly that same span in MMA (155-170)there are 2. Given the wrestling background of many MMA fighters and the weight-cuting techniques they have mastered, there is an ASTRONOMICAL size difference between those 2 weight classes in MMA, a size difference BJ Penn was never able to overcome.

Roy Jones Jr. went from 160 pounds, all the way to heavyweight and defeated John Ruiz. How was he able to accomplish this this? Because in boxing, speed kills and no one was faster in his prime than Roy Jones Jr. The difference in MMA is that nothing negates speed like being picked up and slammed into the mat, and that happened to BJ throughout his welterweight fights.

The frustrating thing is that against the best lightweights in the world he was simply magnificent. Matt Serra was the only lightweight he couldn't finish and his list of victims is a who's who of the division. He didn't just defeat guys like Sean Sherk, Din Thomas, Diego Sanchez, and Kenny Florian, he DESTROYED them. For comparison's sake: current lightweight king Frankie Edgar out-boxed Sean Sherk and earned a clear unanimous decision, BJ Penn OBLITERATED Sherk with a flying knee and waved off the fight. He wasn't just fun to watch at 155, he was awe-inspiring, but he just wasn't content to stay there.

Despite his hall-of-fame credentials, he never defeated more than 3 lightweights in a row. He was always looking to stretch his horizons, despite never quite clearing out an increasingly talented lightweight division. It would be nice to see how he would do against the new, hungry breed at 155, guys like Gray Maynard, Ben Henderson, and Donald Cerrone. But if Penn's last performance was truly the end there is a certain fitting poetry to it: it was against a gigantic welterweight against whom he fought hard, but was physically outmatched. If we see him again, I hope he takes a lesson from that fight and keeps his sights firmly on the lightweight division...

For the love of fighting

You have to love fighting more than you love winning. You will always fight, you won't always win.

That's what I always tell the fighters I teach. Joe Warren might be the perfect example of why I preach that philosophy.

In the opening video piece they always play for Joe Warren he says a line about why he fights:
"I love belts, I love crowds, and I love winning, so this is right up my alley"

Everyone loves those things Joe. How about MRIs? Hospitals? Cage-side physicians asking you seemingly ridiculous questions like "What is your mother's name?" and "Can you tell me what day it is?" Do you like your cornerman telling you the details of a fight you can't remember? Seeing someone's hand raised at your expense...?

That is the flip-side of the sport. It's a reality "The Baddest Man on the Planet" must now live with. People get involved in sports for the thrill of victory, not the agony of defeat. Fighting carries that agony to a uniquely personal level. This is not a team sport, the blame for defeat or victory rest squarely on the shoulders of the combatant. The same can be said for tennis, but Raphael Nadal can lose a dozen matches without a single concussion check. If you lose you have no one to blame but yourself, and the physical and emotional consequences can be devastating, especially in the case of Joe Warren.

Joe is an emotional fighter, thats been obvious from the beginning. He psyches himself up for every fight and makes the fight as intensely personal as possible. His talks about the horrors he is going to inflict on his opponent, and talks, and talks, until he has convinced himself that victory is already assured. The vulnerability of this approach is that it only works as long as you believe it. The toll of that KO is much harder on a fighter who has blown himself up to superhuman proportions. Not every fighter would have taken that loss with tears streaming down their face, but with Joe Warren it was inevitable.

Joe Warren got to become Bellator champion in part because he believed that what happened against Alexis Vila couldn't happen to him. Now that he has been faced with the stark reality that he can be knocked out, moving forward will not be an easy task.

Fighters with a wide range of skills, guys like GSP, Bernard Hopkins, and Ernesto Hoost, can come back from defeats with a relatively simple formula. They can analyze what they did wrong, tweak their training, eliminate the mistakes, and go to their next fight with a different game-plan. Joe Warren does not have a wide range of skills. Sure, he has outstanding wrestling, but his submission game is rudimentary and his boxing is basic at best. As far as the technical aspects go, he has very little to fall back on.

A large part of Joe Warren's success as a fighter lies in his ability to take a beating and keep on coming forward. The big question is "Will Warren have the ability to take that beating now that he knows he can be knocked out?" Warren never fought to protect himself, he never hesitated to push the pace of a fight, even when he was taking hellish punishment. Having felt the devastation of a brutal KO, that "damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead" style may go out the window.

The simple biological fact is that chins don't get stronger. Warren had taken two wicked beatings in his last featherweight fights before he faced Vila and they certainly might have contributed to his poor performance in his last two fights. Fighters like Alexander Arlovski, Wanderlei Silva, and Roy Jones Jr. can all attest to the fact that once the ability to take a shot goes, it's gone for good.

Joe Warren would have had a tough road under the BEST of circumstances. Even if he had taken the 135 belt (no easy task in and of itself) he still would have had consecutive title defenses against two of the best featherweights in the world: Patricio Pitbull and Pat Curran. Now, however, he has to face Pitbull (a man who sees Joe Warren's face every time he goes to sleep) after suffering the worst loss of his career.

It will take "The Baddest Man on the Planet" to overcome the obstacles Joe Warren has in front of him. He will have to find out if he really has championship heart?  Can he still walk through an avalanche of punishment to claim victory?

Does he love fighting, or does he just love winning?

Sandro vs. Curran

There is a certain amount of satisfaction when you see the top two fighters in a Bellator tournament reach the finals. While we dont have seedings in Bellator, Marlon Sandro and Pat Curran would have been our #1 and #2 respectively. They are a combined 34-6 and Curran made it all the way to a championship showdown with Eddie Alvarez, while Sandro is the former Sengoku Featherweight champ.

They have both looked very solid in the Bellator tournament. Curran knocked down, then submitted, hard hitting Peruvian Luis Palomino (with a Peruvian Necktie, coincidence?) and then won a methodical decision over Ronnie Mann. Sandro won by decision twice over two VERY tough Brazilians: Genair DaSilva and Nazareno Malegarie.

The key to this fight lies in the stylistic differences between the two fighters.

Before the Mann/Curran fight, a lot of people I talked to were excited about it and expected a war between two outstanding strikers, I was not one of them. One thing about Pat Curran is that the guy doesn't brawl. He is a very tight striker who is VERY averse to taking risks. People always remember his knockout of Mike Ricci and his aforementioned submission over Luis Palomino, but those victories are the exception to the rule. Curran got to where he is by staying safe and winning close (even controversial) decisions. Against Mann, Curran used his considerable size advantage to claim the center of the cage and keep the explosive Mann on the outside looking for a way in, he never found it and lost a clear decision.

Mann is a tight striker as well who throws crisp, accurate combinations. He didn't have the skill set, or the size, to bully his way into the proper range to get his offense going. Marlon Sandro is a completely different kind of fighter.

Against both DaSilva and Malegarie, Sandro was a volume puncher. He, like Curran, prefers tight punches, but tends to let his hands go with less regard for the consequences. He is a Nova Uniao black belt with outstanding submission skills, but against his fellow Brazilians he took the path of least resistance and chose to turn it into boxing match.

One problem with Curran's style in this fight is his decided lack of urgency, even in close fights. In his decision wins over Huerta and Imada the fights were anything but secure in the last rounds, and yet Curran stuck to his "stay tight and see" game-plan, luckily for him the coin landed in his favor both times. Against Eddie Alvarez he never really went into an offensive mode, despite being behind throughout the entire fight.

The advantages of Curran and Sandro cancel each other out to some degree. Curran is the better wrestler, while Sandro has the better Jiu-Jitsu. In keeping with his conservative nature, Curran tends to use his wrestling defensively to keep the fight on the feet. Eddie Alvarez, Roger Huerta, and Tody Imada all had trouble taking Curran down, and when they did, they had little success keeping him there. Sandro isn't known for his wrestling ability and will have a hard time getting Curran to the mat if the stand-up isn't going his way. Curran, however, is equally unlikely to take Sandro down and risk a ground battle with the submission master.

I think this fight will be decided by the action on the feet. The question will be whether or not Sandro can stay busy and outwork Curran without opening himself up to a knockout blow. Sandro moves forward well and tends to throw punches right down the pipe, the kind of punches that don't leave a lot of room to counter. Curran angles well and keeps his hand very high, but is often too comfortable moving backward and giving away valuable rounds.

The first round of this fight is going to be crucial, as this is the kind of fight where you don't want to fall behind. As I stated before, Curran has a tight defense and generally limits his offense to looking for a big shot finish. He is hard to gain ground on if you fall behind to him, but he doesn't necessarily pick it up when HE falls behind. Whoever gets out ahead early is in good shape, as both of these fighters are very difficult to finish. Curran might want to use his take-down offensively at the end of rounds to in order to steal them, without giving the BJJ black belt enough time to get his submission game going, a strategy that worked VERY well for Michael Chandler against a similar opponent: Patricky Freire.

Will Sandro be able to put pressure on without succumbing to the lethal overhand of Curran? Will Curran turn it up when he has to earn himself another shot at a Bellator title?

Those are the two questions that will decide this title fight. No matter what happens the champ, whoever it is, had better be training.

Top fights of all time that never happened.

Someday if I have a serious biological error/lapse in judgement and have a child, I can imagine us gathered around a synthetic fireplace (global warming will make real ones totally unnecessary) where I will delight them with tales of WWAAAAAYYY back when MMA first started and there were a handful of relevant international promotions.

The UFC's buyout of their largest competitor certainly has its downside for fighters and fans alike, but one positive side-effect is that we will see many matches between outstanding fighters that would have been unthinkable due to cross-promotional barriers that no longer exist (much like finally being able to get Mexican Coke in a glass bottle in So-Cal, but I digress).

Nick Diaz is finally slated to take on GSP, Jacare and Anderson Silva will tangle eventually , and who isnt looking forward to seeing Stikeforce's heavyweight elite take a run at the UFC belt?

I thought now would be a good time to take a look back at time some amazing match-ups that never happened. Fans may have wanted them, the fighters may have wanted them, but they just didnt get done. Often, but not always, there were issues between rival promotions that made these matches impossible, other times the issues were much more complicated. "Fans" who believe MMA started in 2005 with the Ultimate Fighter can just stop reading now, most of these names won't mean anything to you:

Kazushi Sakuraba vs. Frank Shamrock

The year was 1999. Frank Shamrock had just defeated a young challenger named Tito Ortiz with a dramatic come-from-behind KO in one of the greatest fights in UFC history up to that time. Frank carried his Middleweight belt out of the ring (yeah thats what it was called at the time) and walked away from the UFC. His destination was Japan, where he had started his career and made name on the Pancrase curcuit (what's Pancrase? ummmm...."slap boxing with padded boots on" is the best description I can think of "the Diet Coke of MMA" also springs to mind).

Kazushi Sakuraba was carving his way through the Gracie family at the same time. Bear in mind that this was back when a Gracie losing was a big deal. Royler, Royce. and Ryan all suffered their first losses to him and Renzo (thought by some to be the best MMA fighter in the family) had his arm mangled by the man who would become known as "The Gracie Hunter". EVERYONE wanted a piece of this guy. He took on the best and beat them with a combination of flare and technique that is rare in any sport.

SEG sports and its UFC brand was losing steam in the U.S. and Pride was paying top dollar, and thats where Shamrock hoped to end up. He had a K1 MMA fight against Elvis Sinosec to re-introduce himself to the Japanese fans, but the bout he wanted never materialized. The key to understanding it is the fact that Shamrock's stateside popularity didnt mean much to Japanese fans. The best ratings for Pride shows featured fights that the US audience wouldnt watch if you paid them between Japanese fighters with questionable skills. Bob Sapp, Giant Silva, and Hidehiko Yoshida were HUGE draws in Japan and freak-show contests that defied logic were mainstays overseas. Against that backdrop, Shamrock didnt draw the star-power necessary to get a shot at the king.

Wanderlei Silva vs Tito Ortiz II

If you ask most fans who Tito Ortiz beat to capture the UFC title they will draw a complete blank, and for good reason. The title was vacant at the time and this was during the "dark ages" of MMA when the UFC was banned from the PPV market (hard to picture now isnt it?). It was won in a match against Wanderlei Silva, who was most well known in the UFC at the time for being BLITZED by Vitor Belfort in 44 seconds (the first time the phrase "thats the old Vitor" was used, 1998 and I still CONSTANTLY hear it....but more on that later). Tito won the match via unanimous decision despite actually turning around and RUNNING from Silva at one point. Still, he worked his ground and pound game and began an historic run at light-heavyweight.

Wanderlei began an historic run of his own after that fight. He made the transition to Pride and cut a swath through the light-heavyweight ranks, capturing the belt and demolishing the aforementioned Sakuraba (a completely unnecessary) 3 times. He went undefeated for 4 years and didnt lose to another light-heavyweight for 5, at one time fighting 17 times without a loss.

Tito held the UFC gold for 3 1/2 years before being upset (yeah, it was an upset, everyone seems to forget that) by a 40 year old Randy Couture. From 2000- 2006 he held an impressive 11-2 record, losing only to Couture and Chuck Liddell. Many fans on both sides of the Pacific wondered who would own a rematch....but it was not to be.

By the time the UFC aquired pride in 2007, Wanderlei had simply been through too many wars and was past his prime. He has dropped down to middleweight and looked solid in beating Michael Bisping, but the "Axe Murderer" of old may be gone forever. Tito is in even worse shape. He has not had a victory since beating Ken Shamrock for the (COMPLETELY unnecesary) 3rd time and is 0-4-1 and has a longer list of injuries than a Evil Knievel. But when both guys were on top of their respective promotions, it would have been a match to see.

Jens Pulver vs Rumina Sato

The year was 2000. Jens Pulver was quickly making a name for himself as the the man to beat in the fledgling 155lb division in the UFC. His record was an impressive 9-2-1 with 7 of those wins coming by KO or TKO. He was a little dude with solid wrestling and a HEAVY left hand. He had just shown how heavy by breaking the jaw of John Lewis in a mere 15 seconds. If there was going to be any competition for this guy it would probably have to come from the land of the rising sun, where the lightweights reigned supreme.

There wasn't any lightweight more feared than Rumina Sato. He didn't just fight for the Shooto organization, he WAS Shooto. The fans loved this guy. He had a combination of technical slickness and near suicidal aggression that was entertaining every single time. The guy actually won an MMA fight via "flying reverse triangle choke" and his flying armbar win over Charles Diaz looks like something out of a Jet Li movie. He was a huge name in MMA and if you knew one name from overseas it was Rumina Sato.

Zuffa had just purchased the struggling UFC from SEG Sports and was looking to put on their first show. Dana White was a huge fan of Sato and wanted to bring the Shooto star over to his promotion. The match was a great fit on many levels: Japanese icon vs. up and coming U.S. superstar in the making, Brawler vs. Submission Specialist, #1 vs #2 for the inaugural lightweight championship.

Too bad no one told Caol Uno.

He had already beaten Sato once, a grueling match that saw Uno come back and win via rear-naked. Most Japanese fans saw it as a fluke and were sure Sato would avenge himself in a rematch. A vicious punch-kick combo proved everyone wrong as Uno KO'd Sato a mere 2 1/2 minutes into their rematch.

Zuffa, to their credit, went with the winner and pitted Uno against Pulver for the lightweight belt, a belt Pulver would hold for less than a year before walking away from the UFC in 2002. It was an outstanding fight and tempers the regret that the Japanese legend never fought in the octagon.

Wanderlei Silva vs. Vitor Belfort II

Is anyone else sick of everyone mentioning or referencing this fight every time Vitor Belfort gets in the ring? It seems like everyone is waiting for a performance like that again and are so sure it is just around the corner.

The year was 1997 and Vitor Belfort was the Mike Tyson of MMA. He was 19 years old looked completely unstoppable. He had dispatched his first 4 opponents in a combined 3:05. He had blinding hand speed and was thought to be one of the greatest BJJ fighters on the planet (anyone remember this quote "[Belfort] and Rickson Gracie are the best in the world on the ground", still hilarious). He trained with the Carlson Gracie Team when it was at the height of it's power and seemed destined for the heavyweight crown.

Then along came Randy Couture. He didnt just beat Belfort, he ground him into the mat. Not only did he out-grapple Belfort, he out-boxing him as well. It was the performance that really put Randy Couture on the map.

Belfort's next performance was a little bizarre. He beat Joe Charles without throwing a single punch, I think he was trying to make up for the fact that Couture had passed his guard like it wasn't even there. He responded to the post-fight interview question with inaudible one-word answers, it was the first hint that this dude had some confidence issues.

At Ultimate Brazil in 1998, Belfort moved down to 205 to take on the "Axe Murderer". Silva was only 5-1 and completely unknown at the time. This fight was his big break and he made the least of it. Belfort TORCHED Silva in a mere 44 seconds with a flurry of unanswered punches that has been replayed so many times I'm sick of seeing it.

As I went over in the Tito-Wanderlei section, Silva went on to an INCREDIBLE run in Pride. The weird thing is that Belfort fought for the same organization, in the same weight-class, and at the same time, yet they never faced each other again. Considering how badly I'm sure Silva wants payback, its strange that this fight never took place under the Pride banner.

There are basically two factors to keep in mind when analysing when this rematch never took place. Number one: UFC history meant very little to the Japanese fans and number two: Belfort was never really a title contender in Pride. Although he went 4-1 with the organization, he was never really a fan favorite and only finished one opponent. Wanderlei was the proverbial "wildman" from Brazil and decimated his opponents, while Belfort never fought like the man who has devastated Silva in the UFC.

Both guys now find themselves in the octagon at the same weight-class, so this re-match could potentially still happen. But considering the wars Wanderlei has been through and the inconsistent nature of Belfort's performances since that beating by Couture, it may be too late to see the fight all would have hoped for.

Tank Abbot vs. Ken Shamrock

There were basically four names that dominated the early tournament-based UFCs: Royce Gracie, Dan Severn, Ken Shamrock, and David "Tank" Abbott. Of those four, Abbott is the only one who never fought any of the other three.

Abbott was a brawler who was the original "Huntington Beach Bad-Boy". We knew when we saw him make fun of a convulsing John Matua that this guy had a serious attitude problem and KO power. To say he was not particularly technical is a bit of an understatement. This guy had 24 fights and NEVER WENT PAST THE FIRST ROUND!!! He was certainly fun to watch though. He actually knocked Don Frye on his ass with a JAB. In the early days, when MMA was more spectacle than sport, he was a mean brawler with a style that was easy for fans to understand. He looked, talked, and acted like a guy who punched people for money.

Ken Shamrock was the only fighter other than Royce Gracie who had any business being in the first UFC. He was well-rounded, experienced, and could bench-press a small truck. Before leaving MMA in 1997 for a stint in the WWE, Shamrock's only octagon losses were to Gracie and Severn and his overall MMA record was an impressive 23-5-1. He was a MAJOR star for the organization and was a force to be reckoned with in the heavyweight division.

Why these two never met in something of a mystery. They were aggressive, crowd pleasing strikers with big names and they HATED each other. These were two guys with no shortage of ego and their ability to trash-talk was legendary. Abbott would bad-mouth Santa Clause with no hesitation and famously called his nemesis "Glam-rock". Shamrock had a knack for building up fights by making them into "grudge-matches" filled with personal venom. Three not-even-a-little-bit-competitive matches with Tito Ortiz drew HUGE rating for no discernable reason other than the words leading up to them.

They never settled their differences in the cage however. The old SEG Sports UFC was always challenged when it came to making the most of its brand. It seems obvious in hindsight that these two should have squared off, but the powers that ran SEG never put it together.

Rickson Gracie vs. Anyone significant in MMA

Most people would put Kazushi Sakuraba in that "anyone" spot, but the point is that there was more than one option.

Have you heard the story? Rickson Gracie walks into Barra Gracie (or Gracie Humaita in the story I heard) and lines everyone up against the wall and taps them out one at a time. Black belts, world champions, guys who out-weigh him by 100 pounds, they all submit. He beats them EASILY, none of the matches are even close, no one even gets an offensive position on him, and he does it using moves that any blue-belt would know.

In his competitive years he was simply unstoppable, he was the lion of the Gracie family. His brothers were good, but he was light-years better. No one I've spoken to seems to know why, he was just better. He has never lost in BJJ, in fact he never even came particularly close to losing. I've literally heard of black belts bragging about how LONG it took Rickson to submit them, as it that were tantamount to a victory. Too many people I respect in the sport have told me that Rickson is the best Jiu-Jitsu fighter to ever set foot on a mat...period.

My belief that he is makes his career in MMA somewhat disappointing. Aside from his two fights against Rei Zulu in the early 80s, Rickson spent the bulk of his career competing in the mid-late 90s in Japan. He was the "Vale Tudo Japan" champion in 1994 and 1995, he also fought in the inaugural Pride show in 1997 and the promotion's fourth show exactly one year later.

Before taking on Masakatsu Funaki in 2000 Rickson's record was 10-0 with all of his wins coming by submission. The record is impressive, until one realizes that exactly ONE of Rickson's opponents, Yuki Nakai, won more matches than he lost and Nakai himself only beat one opponent with a winning record.

That's not a rarity for a fighter in the mid-1990s. It wasn't unusual for a fighter to make their name against fighters who had never fought before. The sport was just beginning and cards were full of neophytes making their debuts in what were, at the time, major promotions.

By the end of the decade though, the landscape had changed. Professional MMA athletes were taking the sport to a new level, style vs style was giving way to MMA fighter vs MMA fighter. Fighters like Bas Rutten, Frank Shamrock, Igor Vovchanchyn, and Kiyoshi Tamura were paving the way for the MMA fighters of today. How would the lion of the Gracie family have performed against any of these more well-rounded fighters? We will never know. In both of his Pride appearances he fought the pro-wrestler Nobuhiko Takada, submitting him both times. On the same show in which Rickson submitted the ummm..."physical entertainer" for the second time, Kazushi Sakuraba, Igor Vovchanchyn, Akira Shoji, Alan Goes, and Mark Kerr all fought. Any of those men would have been more fitting opponents for the greatest Jiu-Jitsu black belt of all time.

In 2000 Kazushi Sakuraba was carving his way through the Gracie family. At the time it was assumed that the best of the clan would step up and defend the family name. Instead, Rickson took on Masakatsu Funaki in his first full-rules MMA fight at the Colosseum 2000 show. It was a puzzling choice to most MMA fans. Funaki had a solid reputation and was a founder of the Pancrase promotion, but by 2000 he had gone 3-3-1 in his last 7 fights and was near the end of his competitive days. Rickson's submission victory over Funaki would be the last one of his MMA career. Sakuraba would beat 4 Gracies before losing a rematch to Royce in 2007.

Would "The Gracie Hunter" have bagged the biggest lion of them all, or would Rickson have redeemed him family's name in dramatic fashion?

We will never know...

The BJ Penn effect

Its often said that history is simply the lie that is repeated the most times. When I was studying for my undergraduate degree in history at UCLA I ran into this phenomenon a lot. People who fancy themselves as pseudo-historians will rattle on about their supposed knowledge of history without the slightest idea of what they are talking about. Hearing for the millionth time about how FDR allowed the attack on Pearl Harbor, or seeing afro-centric posters featuring a black Cleopatra (she wasn't african actually, her father was Macedonian) gets a little old after awhile.

This effect occurs quite a bit in the realm of MMA as well.

One of the most enduring myths in MMA concerns the guard of BJ Penn. Every time he is on his back is a fight, Joe Rogan just about loses his mind. He seems to want to create new adjectives to describe the wonder that we are seeing before us. When Sean Sherk was watching his destruction of Joe Stevenson and was asked what worried him the most about facing BJ, the first thing he talked about was his flexibility in the guard. In a recent article article on Sherdog by Jason Probst about the upcoming Penn vs Fitch fight, he wrote that "Penn's takedown defense and wily bottom game make taking him to the ground a difficult proposition and surviving there an especially risky one."

Sure the guy can comb his hair with his feet, and that kind of flexibility is always fun to watch, but there is a very simple fact that I would like to share with anyone that is interested. You guys ready?

BJ PENN HAS NEVER SUBMITTED AN OPPONENT FROM HIS BACK IN AN MMA FIGHT!!!

That's right, not ONCE in 24 professional fights has BJ Penn caught an opponent from his guard. Im not knocking the guys BJJ skills in ANY way, I think the dude in a serious freak on the ground, but its his top-game and back control that are so impressive. Once BJ gets on top of you, you are in deep shit, no two ways about it.

The guys that have been successful against BJ were actually the guys who could take him down and keep him on his back. After getting tattooed in the opening round of their first fight, GSP got smart and started taking BJ down and won a unanimous decision. He followed the same game plan, minus the first round beating, in their rematch and had an easy fight. Lightweights Frankie Edgar and Jens Pulver both beat BJ on the strength of their wrestling and conditioning.

I think the myth of BJ's guard has actually won him a lot of fights. I was AMAZED at how little effort guys like Sean Sherk and Joe Stevenson (both known for their wrestling skills) put into trying to take BJ to the ground. They seemed to want to bang with BJ and use their wrestling to stay on the feet; where they were clearly out-classed. Which brings me to rarely acknowledged fact #2:

BJ PENN HAS MORE KNOCKOUTS THAN SUBMISSIONS!!

Thats right kids, stunner #2 is that he has 7 kos and 6 subs, and while he does get plenty of credit for his boxing skills, his striking isn't treated with the same kind of awe as his submission game. Fighters seem to want to avoid the ground at all costs, when they should be doing just the opposite.

Those are the big reasons why I'm not particularly interested in Penn's upcoming fight against Jon Fitch. Jon Fitch does what Jon Fitch does; he pressures you on the feet, takes you down, and grinds on you until you wish you had been a pro volleyball player. If Fitch isn't blinded by the hype, is cautious on the feet (and who ever accused Fitch of not being cautious enough?) and sticks to what he does, I dont see him having a ton of trouble sending BJ back down to the lightweight division for good.

Last fact of the day:

BJ PENN HAS NEVER BEATEN A WELTERWEIGHT IN THE UFC WHO WASN'T NAMED MATT HUGHES

Will that change on the 27th? We'll have to see, but if you want to examine something fairly, it's always important to look past the hype...

Long live the Emperor...

Last night's Strikeforce show was hard to watch. Its never easy to see a great fighter at the end of his career, but to watch Fedor take a savage beating at the hands of a GIGANTIC and motivated heavyweight was a sight I hoped I would never see.

I worked for M-1 for 2 years and got to spend a lot of time around Fedor and know him about as well as someone can who doesn't speak any Russian. In my experience he is a quiet, gentle, humble, and spiritual guy who was never too busy to say hi to me or anyone else. He couldn't care less about the trappings of success or the fame that being an international figure has brought him. He trains in the same town he grew up in, surrounded by the same family members and coaches he has had since the beginning of his career. Its a shame to see someone as humble and likable as Fedor at the end of his professional road.

He looked off from the start of the Bigfoot fight. Fedor has never been a big heavyweight, he stands at 6 feet tall and weighs around 230lbs. He has been successful in the past against bigger, stronger fighters in part because of his ability to commit 1000% to his punches.

I was ringside when he demolished the much bigger Tim Sylvia. Fedor put everything he had behind every punch and Sylvia looked like he got hit by a train. That kind of commitment requires a rare combination of confidence and timing, both of which were lacking in his last fight. As soon as they began exchanging, Fedor looked tentative. A lot of Fedor's head movement came from his tendency to lean into his punches. Because he wasn't committing, Fedor caught a lot of counter punches from Bigfoot and missed a ton of shots in the opening round. He also seemed a little unsure of himself after he wasn't able to seriously hurt Bigfoot with his punches.

Once Bigfoot was on his back, Fedor hesitated to act. I thought it was strange that the commentators were advising Fedor to stay off the ground with Bigfoot. Fedor has always had one of the most dangerous ground and pound attacks in the sport. Does anyone else remember him DIVING into the guard of Nogueira, landing bombs left and right? It could certainly be due to his last fight against Verdum, but Fedor seemed hesitant to commit to his formidable GnP attack against Bigfoot. Yes, Bigfoot is a BJJ black belt, but only 2 of his 15 wins had come via submission and getting on top of an opponent is the easiest way to negate their size and reach advantage, yet Fedor hesitated and was seemingly unsure of himself and his strategy.

Fedor hasn't had consistent fights since his days as the king of Pride. From 2002 (the year he joined the promotion) to his last fight for Pride in 2006 he had a total of 17 fights. Since then he has averaged less than 2 per year for various promotions. For all the expense and hype put into Strikeforce's acquisition of Fedor, he has only fought for them 3 times with a 1-2 record. The layoffs and renegotiations have clearly hurt Fedor's performance in the ring and his mystique has all but vanished.

Its a strange phenomenon in sports. An athlete seems to be operating on another level, untouchable, invincible, a spectacle that seems to make his peers look as though they are in slow-motion. Then a few cracks appear, and suddenly it all vanishes into thin air. Athletes often change teams, trainers, coaches, but nothing really seems to help, the magic is gone. It was enlightening for me to watch BJ Penn's corner in his 2nd loss to Frankie Edgar. They were bewildered, their guy had never required actual coaching before. BJ had always gone in and done his thing and won, but now that wasn't happening and they didn't know what to do. It reminded me a little of Aaron Snowell holding a rubber glove to the face of Mike Tyson during his loss to Buster Douglas while repeating "you have to go after him" over and over. Great athletes seem to be on automatic and those around them are merely watching the show.

Will Fedor join the ranks of athletes like Roy Jones Jr, Chuck Liddell, and Joe Namath? Or will he make adjustments and see a few years of success before the final curtain? The question can only be answered by Fedor himself. Given his ambivalence toward the entire notion of being a wealthy and famous athlete, he might not be motivated to drop down to light-heavyweight and make another go at it. I don't think he can be successful in the Strikeforce heavyweight division that is arguably the deepest of any MMA promotion. Even if he goes down to LHW and clears out the division in Stikeforce, I don't think it will be enough to make him #1 in the eyes of most pundits, and who knows if that's even a factor to Fedor.

The next few weeks are going to decide Fedor's future in the world of MMA. I think that regardless of what happens, Fedor should be recognized as the greatest heavyweight in MMA's young history...

The nature of the business

Since it came out that Im not going to be the commentator for Bellator in 2011, the outpouring of support for I have received has really been overwhelming. While my departure from Bellator requires a blog all its own (which I will sit down and write now that I have plenty of free time) the comments I have read about where I should seek employment have opened my eyes to the fact that a lot of people have only a vague idea of what job I actually do.

Comments I have read or heard since the news has broken:

"only person who is an acceptable replacement IMO is Michael Schiavello"

"I would love to see him replace Mauro Ranallo"

"They should replace Jimmy with Todd Harris, I thought he did a great job in the WEC"

"You should team up with Pat Miletich"

"Love to see you and Rogan work together man"

No matter what your opinions of the broadcasting ability of the people that were suggested and whether or not they should replace me or vice-versa, the fact is that NONE of the aforementioned combinations are possible.

A standard broadcasting team consists of a color commentator alongside a play-by-play commentator. Each of those people have VERY specific roles and have to work in tandem in order to make a broadcast work.

An easy way to keep the division of labor straight is to remember that the play-by-play commentator is in charge of the "who and what". He tells the audience who is fighting, what their hometown is, truck colors, and biographical info to familiarize the people with the fighter as a person. If they played soccer as a kid and were raised by their grandparents, the play-by-play commentator is the one who will tell you about it.

During the fight itself the "what" side of the equation means that the play-by-play commentator will narrate the actual physical action of the fight, calling out strikes and takedowns etc. as they occur. They also serve as the bridge between the audience and the production itself, bringing them back from commercial breaks, adding sponsor tags, and plugging upcoming events.

The color commentator is in charge of the "why and how". The play-by-play commentator will point out an overhand right(the "what"), and its the color commentator's job to explain why the fighter chose to use that particular punch, the strategy behind it, and the effect it may have on the outcome of the fight. My job is to provide insight into an action that comes from experience in the sport. This comes into play a LOT when it comes to the grappling side of MMA. The casual fan has no idea how to set up far-side armbar, explaining it to them while keeping the information within the context of the fight is a big part of my job. You never want to give a long-winded explanation of something that will take longer than the action itself. Explaining how to defend a choke while the fighter is tapping is a good way to look like an idiot, not that I haven't done it more than once.

While the play-by-play guy is usually in charge of general biographical info, background that pertains to the fight itself is usually my domain. I will talk about the fighter's team, his history against similar opponents, and the specific training that might impact the fight itself. Obviously, as the guy in the both who has actually fought, I might have a personal or professional connection to the fighter or his team and that insight is always useful.

A typical color/play-by-play exchange will go something like this:

Play-by-play: "Good right hand by Melendez!"

Color: "That's the best punch against a southpaw, Cesar Gracie told me that they've been working on that shot a lot in camp."

Play-by-play lays down the bricks, color fills in the mortar, that's pretty much how the house is constructed. Problems generally occur when commentators get their roles confused. Its important to keep in mind that most play-by-play commentators are extremely knowledgeable. Mike Goldberg has been doing UFC events for over 13 years. He is familiar with every submission, every striking combination, and every defensive tactic a fighter could use. A big part of his job is to understand his role and "throw" to Joe Rogan when it comes to tactical questions that an expert should answer. Usually when Goldberg says to Rogan "What do you think he's going for here Joe?" he has a probably pretty good idea of what the guy is going for, but he understands his role and know the broadcast will flow a lot better with Rogan taking care of the technical aspects of the fight. A play-by-play guy who thinks he is a color commentator will never give his partner space to talk and will fill in every possible second with his own voice, its never fun to listen to.

On the color side, few things are more annoying than a color guy yelling over his play-by-play partner. The nuts and bolts of the action are the domain of the play-by-play announcer. If the color guy cant add any technical details he should know when to lay off an let his partner call the action, we never need two guys announcing a left hook. The end of the fight is particularly important timing-wise. The finish of the fight is a play-by-play specialty, it's where he adds his tag-line and wraps up the action. Goldberg's signature "IT IS ALLLLLL OVER" is well known to everyone in MMA and Rogan knows when to back off and let him do his thing. Perhaps the most annoying thing to hear in an MMA broadcast is the play-by-play guy calling the ending of a fight while the color guy screams "OH, OH, OH!!!" at the top of his lungs.

Teamwork, timing, and the ability to temper one's ego are THE biggest factors in a successful broadcast team. It takes time to build the necessary relationship. If your partner is out to steamroll you and in love with the sound of his own voice then the broadcast will suffer. Trust that your partner will help you and you will help him goes a long way in getting through a 3-hour event.

For the record: Michael Schiavello, Mike Goldberg, Mauro Renallo, and Todd Harris are play-by-play announcers. I cant do their job, and they can't do mine. I can work alongside any of them as a broadcast team, but our skills are mutually exclusive.

Joe Rogan, Pat Miletich, Frank Trigg, and Frank Shamrock are color announcers. The only way I can work alongside them is if there is a 3-man booth (usually consisting of one play-by-play announcer and 2 color commentators, a format used mostly by Strikeforce).